Monthly Archives: May 2014

20 posts

Why Dyana Sofya is the underdog in Teluk Intan

Media Statement by Dr. Ong Kian Ming, MP for Serdang, on the 27th of May, 2014

Why Dyana Sofya is the underdog in Teluk Intan

Why would the DAP candidate, Dyana Sofya, be considered the underdog in a seat won by the DAP with more than 7000 votes in the 13th general election? Is it merely a ploy to gain more sympathy votes for DAP on the 31st of May?

There is no doubt in my mind that there is a very real possibility that Dyana and the DAP would lose this by-election. While her candidacy has been a breath of fresh air and has been applauded by various quarters at the national level, there are a few important factors which are at work against Dyana among the people who matter most in this by-election, namely the Teluk Intan voters themselves.

A whispering campaign has already started among certain quarters to appeal for Chinese voters to vote for a Chinese representative in Teluk Intan. This was always a challenge which was recognized by the DAP from day one – that fielding a Malay candidate in a non-Malay majority seat would cost the party some votes, especially among the Chinese voters.

At the same time, the fact that Dyana does not hail Teluk Intan would be used against her especially since the BN candidate, Dato Mah Siew Keong, is a local boy with an influential and well-known family backing him. We fear that the fact that Dyana relocated to Gelang Patah, Johor as part of her responsibility as Lim Kit Siang’s political secretary and that she would do the same if elected as the MP for Teluk Intan would be drowned out by this ‘local’ versus ‘outsider’ campaign message. Of course, lost in this message is the fact that NOT being local did not prevent two Perak born former MCA presidents – Dr. Ling Liong Sik and Ong Ka Ting – from serving as MPs in Johor for most of their political lives.

It is noteworthy that Mah Siew Keong received 4606 more votes at the parliamentary level compared to his BN colleagues in the state seats of Pasir Bedamar and Changkat Jong even though he went up against local DAP three term Pasir Bedamar ADUN – the late Seah Leong Peng. Mah’s split voting advantage in GE2013 is an indication of the strength of the Mah family ‘brand’ in Teluk Intan where such ties matter especially among older voters.

Dyana’s age, her gender and her appearance have also been heavily criticized and attacked especially by UMNO politicians and in the mainstream media.

These attacks will be the most effective among older Chinese voters whose support for Pakatan is noticeably lower than among younger voters. For example, in the Jalan Market Barat polling station, which is 92% Chinese, 72.5% of older voters in the first polling stream (or saluran) vote for DAP in GE13 compared to 85.1% among the youngest voters in the 4th (and final) polling stream who voted for DAP.

Older Chinese voters also outnumber younger Chinese voters in Teluk Intan. 40% of Chinese voters in Teluk Intan are above 55 years of age compared to only 21% who are under 35. In comparison, only 28% of Malay voters are above 55 years of age compared to 34% of voters who are below 35 years of age.

Younger, more pro-Pakatan Chinese voters, are also more likely to be working or studying outside Teluk Intan and may not come back home for this by-election. Turnout in GE2013 was a remarkably high 80.6% compared to only 70.0% in GE2008. A large reason for this high turnout is the return of outstation voters who came back to vote in GE2013. The turnout for this by-election will most certainly be lower than in GE2013. It is expected that the turnout rate would be between 65% to 70%.

One also cannot underestimate the possible impact of PAS’ attempt to table a private members bill for the implementation of hudud in Kelantan especially among the Chinese voters.

These factors – lower support for a non-Chinese DAP candidate who is not seen as a local, a larger proportion of older Chinese voters, a lower turnout rate especially among outstation young voters and the possible impact of the hudud issue – means that DAP’s support among the Chinese voters – at an estimated 85% in GE2013 – would almost certain drop in the upcoming by-election. The Chinese support for DAP is expected to drop by between 5% to 15%.

Among the Indian voters, who supported PR at a 62% rate in GE2013, similar arguments – lower turnout especially among the young, the hudud issue, the Mah family factor – will also explain why Indian support for Dyana and for DAP will fall in the by-election. Factors such as the resignation of Hindraf leader Waythamoorthy as Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister department over the inability of the Prime Minister to deliver on the Hindraf Blueprint will not likely be salient. The Indian support for DAP is expected to drop by between 5% to 10%.

It was and is not anticipated that Dyana’s candidacy would increase PR’s support among Malay voters in Teluk Intan. While fielding Dyana has a candidate has galvanized many young voters including young Malays all over the country to pay attention to this by-election, the local sentiment in Teluk Intan among Malay voters will be hard to overturn within a 2 week campaign period. It will take many years to win the hearts and minds of a majority of Malay voters especially in the Malay majority Changkat Jong are. Hopefully Dyana will have a chance to undertake this challenge but for this by-election at least, it is unlikely that the Malay support for DAP will increase from the 25% we received in GE2013. It would already be an achievement if we managed to preserve the Malay support at 25% given the incessant attacks against Dyana by top UMNO leaders and the many government handouts which have been given in Teluk Intan during this campaign.

Under a relatively optimistic projection, if turnout is at 70%, Malay support is maintained at 25%, Chinese support falls by 10% to 75% and Indian support falls by 5% to 55%, DAP will maintain this seat with a majority of just over 1000. Under a more pessimistic projection, if turnout were to fall to 65%, Malay support falls by 2% to 23, Chinese support falls by 15% to 70% and Indian support falls by 10% to 50%, DAP will lose this seat by slightly more than 1000 votes.

Turnout is key. If voters feel unmotivated to turn out, as was the case for the Bukit Gelugor by-election, and turnout falls below 65%, DAP will almost certainly lose this seat. If turnout is at 70% or more, then the chances for the voters of Teluk Intan to have a young, energetic and idealistic Member of Parliament will be bright.

Dr. Ong Kian Ming
Member of Parliament for Serdang

阿末扎希涉嫌违反《1954年选举犯罪法令》应被展开调查

吉隆坡(5月25日讯)民主行动党沙登区国会议员王建民的媒体新闻稿

阿末扎希涉嫌违反《1954年选举犯罪法令》应被展开调查

在2014年5月24日,内政部长阿末扎希前往安顺,表示在上一届大选共有逾2000名自愿警卫团(Rela)成员没有出来投票。[1]根据报道,阿末扎希也说:“不要跟我玩玩下,我知道谁有投票,谁没有投票。”当天,阿末扎希也告诉出席者他将会“知道”没有出来投票的自愿警卫团成员身份。[2]

选民投票结果本应是被保密,任何泄露选民投票的秘密都是违反了《1954年选举犯罪法令》第5条款。

我敦促总检察长针对阿末扎希是否也已违反了《1954年选举犯罪法令》第5条款(选举投票的保密性)来展开调查,因为他声称能够“知道”选民有无投票。同时,这是否也意味着阿末扎希能够“知道”没有出来投票的选民身份?或是阿末扎希曾要求选委会向他泄露这些信息?他是不是利用这些“资讯”来威胁没有投票给国阵候选人的自愿警卫团(RELA)成员?

此外,在同一个活动上,阿末扎希也表示,如果安顺区的国阵候选人马袖强在2014年5月31日的补选胜出,所有自愿警卫团成员将获得新制服。[3]

我再次促请总检察长针对阿末扎希是否涉嫌选举贿赂,而违反《1954年选举犯罪法令》第10条款来展开调查。

若总检察长未能迅速和果断地采取行动来回应阿末扎希的言论,那只会进一步加强公众印象,认为总检察署只会在有利于国阵政府的时候,才对涉案者有所举动。

行动党沙登国会议员王建民

[1]http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/263740

[2]http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/zahid-promises-rela-new-uniforms-if-gerakan-wins-teluk-intan-polls

[3]http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/zahid-promises-rela-new-uniforms-if-gerakan-wins-teluk-intan-polls

Zahid Hamidi harus disiasat atas kesalahan di bawah Akta Kesalahan Pilihan Raya 1954

Kenyataan Media oleh Dr. Ong Kian Ming, Ahli Parlimen Serdang pada 25 Mei 2014

Zahid Hamidi harus disiasat atas kesalahan di bawah Akta Kesalahan Pilihan Raya 1954

Ketika bercakap kepada ahli-ahli RELA semalam, 24hb Mei 2014, di Teluk Intan, Menteri Dalam Negeri Datuk Zahid Hamidi telah dilaporkan berkata dia tahu bahawa pada terdapat seramai 2,000 ahli-ahli RELA yang layak mengundi tetapi tidak mengundi dalam pilihan raya umum yang lepas.[1]Beliau telah dipetik berkata: “Jangan main-main dengan saya. Saya tahu siapa yang telah mengundi dan tidak mengundi.” Dilaporkan juga bahawa Zahid Hamidi telah memberitahu orang ramai bahawa beliau mampu memeriksa peti undi untuk menentukan siapa yang telah mengundi atau tidak mengundi.[2]

Undi seseorang sebenarnya adalah rahsia dan sebarang pembongkaran undi rahsia tersebut adalah kesalahan di bawah Seksyen 5 Akta Kesalahan Pilihan Raya 1954.

Saya menggesa pejabat Peguam Negara untuk menyiasat Zahid Hamidi dan menentukan sama ada beliau telah melakukan kesalahan di bawah Seksyen 5 Akta Kesalahan Pilihan Raya 1954 (Menjamin Kerahsiaan Undi) kerana beliau mendakwa bahawa mampu tahu sama ada seseorang telah mengundi atau tidak. Adakah ini juga bermakna bahawa beliau mampu untuk menentukan pilihan pengundi tersebut? Adakah beliau telah meminta Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya untuk membekalkan maklumat tersebut kepada beliau? Dan adalah beliau menggunakan ‘ilmu’ ini sebagai ancaman terhadap anggota RELA yang mungkin tidak ingin mengundi calon Barisan Nasional?

Malahan, di acara yang sama, beliau dilaporkan berjanji akan membeli pakaian seragam baru untuk anggota-anggota RELA di Teluk Intan seandainya calon BN, Datuk Mah Siew Keong, memenangi pilihan raya kecil yang akan diadakan nanti pada 31hb Mei 2014.[3]

Saya menggesa Peguam Negara untuk menyiasat Zahid Hamidi untuk rasuah yang merupakan kesalahan di bawah Seksyen 10 Akta Kesalahan Pilihan Raya 1954.

Kegagalan Peguam Negara untuk bertindak cepat dan tegas sebagai tindak balas terhadap kenyataan yang dibuat Zahid Hamidi hanya akan meningkatkan lagi persepsi orang ramai bahawa pejabat Peguam Negara hanya bertindak untuk kepentingan kerajaan BN sahaja.

Dr. Ong Kian Ming
Ahli Parlimen Serdang

[1]http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/263740

[2]http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/zahid-promises-rela-new-uniforms-if-gerakan-wins-teluk-intan-polls

[3]http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/zahid-promises-rela-new-uniforms-if-gerakan-wins-teluk-intan-polls